Go Back   Global Project > Many Challenges Face Americans & The World > LEFT-WING FANATICS (Progressives, Liberals, Socialists & Race Exploitation!)

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 10th, 2019, 07:25 PM
Admin's Avatar
Admin Admin is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,628
Default Are "Progressives" Censoring Others To Protect Themselves - Case Comparison

As the title states, let's make a comparison and see how human behavior works when aiming to:

1.) Protect personal property e.g. land, assets, intellectual property, etc.

2.) Insulate self, group or organization from the truth in order to continue to garner increased wealth, power and/or spread an ideology.



This comparison will be between Bob Costas and the NFL banning him for his rhetoric on brain injuries as related to the sport of football and "progressive" groups/corporations suspending, censoring and banning conservative view points. As you will see, both are quite similar but is it acceptable?



Costas Article Excerpt: Costas was pulled from the broadcast last minute for his comments on concussions and brain damage in the NFL.

“I think the words were, ‘You’ve crossed the line,'” Costas told ESPN.

“My thought was, ‘What line have I crossed?'”

Three months before the Super Bowl, Costas spoke at a journalism symposium at Maryland. That’s when his comments on concussions and brain injuries in the NFL took off.

“The issue that is most substantial — the existential issue — is the nature of football itself,” Costas said, via the Washington Post. “The reality is that this game destroys people’s brains.”

Not soon after, he had been pulled from the Super Bowl broadcast.



Similar Situational Article Excerpts:

Global Spread Of Online Censorship & Totalitarianism Increasing Exponentially

Excerpt: Vietnam has introduced a new cybersecurity law, which criminalizes criticizing the government online and forces internet providers to give authorities’ user data when requested, sparking claims of a “totalitarian” crackdown on dissent.



Twitter Bans Feminist For Writing "Men Aren't Women"

Excerpt: What is insane to me, though, is that while Twitter knowingly permits graphic pornography and death threats on the platform (I have reported countless violent threats, the vast majority of which have gone unaddressed), they won’t allow me to state very basic facts, such as ‘men aren’t women.’ This is hardly an abhorrent thing to say, nor should it be considered ‘hateful’ to ask questions about the notion that people can change sex, or ask for explanations about transgender ideology. These are now, like it or not, public debates — debates that are impacting people’s lives, as legislation and policy are being imposed based on gender identity ideology…



Twitter Blocks All Tweets With Phrase "Illegal Alien"

Excerpt: The federal government, U.S. Supreme Court, and lawyers across the country use the word “illegal alien” to describe immigrants who illegally enter the country, because that’s the definition in the law.

But Twitter makes its own laws, and the social media giant is now blocking folks from promoting any messages with the phrase, which its moderators apparently consider “hate speech.”



Let's compare.

The NFL as an organization that employees thousands of people has a duty to protect its organization but also a duty to protect its players.

No, the NFL does not have to employ Bob Costas, especially when Mr. Costas is out to make highly negative remarks about his potential employer.

Player injuries are important but all the data isn't out. What are the percentages of injuries? This is like asking about the percentages of heart-attacks as related to cheeseburger consumption. Do we ban everything we suspect of causing some form of health hazard? That would be the "progressive", nanny-state.

Casting a broad, negative light on the NFL isn't fair because the NFL is taking this issue seriously.

On the flip-side we have social media giants, multinational companies; such as Google, Facebook and Twitter outright censoring ideas, perspectives, and viewpoints that aren't inline with "progressive" ideology in order to suppress other creative concepts and broad thinking from the public.

These platforms literally have a monopoly on making personal thoughts and ideas public. Yet they won't allow many to share their differing views... views that support the past 2000+ years of building civilization of which has pushed mankind to create the freest nation on Earth, America. And now it is those very viewpoints by "progressives" (supported by social media giants) that aim to destroy America, borders, sexual identity, natural relationships, Caucasians, patriarchy, families, cultures, religions... you get the idea.

The NFL is working hard to figure out the core of brain injuries in the sport of football while "progressive", international corporations like Twitter are actively suppressing viewpoints in order to spread politically correct ideology to the masses... brainwashing them. We could say these social media platforms are creating minor brain injuries due to the hiding (censoring) of healthy information on how to run a society from society.

The NFL has the right to protect its sport and players as they continue the appropriate research.

The social media giants do not have the right to censor what Jack Dorsey (CEO of Twitter) has said is the public square... a place they rule over.

Bob Costas is allowed to speak his mind but when viewed as a loose canon on a mission, creating strife... the NFL does not have to employ him yet the social media giants are creating strife by censoring the largest part of the world... conservative people who simply want a good home for their family, a good school for their kids, a good job, borders to protect their nest egg and a place to pray.

The NFL needs to get this right and help their players but the social media giants need to purge themselves of politically correct ideology and have a balanced format for all in the public square.

The NFL funding brain injury research and protecting its employees while keeping Costas away is not tyranny.

Censoring millions of social media users who have a massive stake in the public debate about the future of their homeland is tyranny. This is what the King of England would do to his subjects therefore America was birthed.

Freedom is not censoring basic, good concepts form the populace. Freedom also isn't spreading "progressive", socialist and globalist propaganda in order to keep people from their overall nature as great builders armed with unlimited minds.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:46 AM.